· Actualizado
Por qué un dólar débil empuja al oro, qué hace el petróleo al CAD, cómo los tipos presionan a las tecnológicas — y por qué las correlaciones son contexto, no señales.
Autor: Charts Quest
Crea una cuenta gratuita en ChartsQuest para leer el artículo completo — y consigue los dos primeros niveles.
Regístrate gratisNo market trades in a vacuum. The US dollar, gold, oil, bond yields, and equity indexes are wired together by pricing mechanics, capital flows, and risk appetite — and a chart reader who understands the wiring sees context that a single-chart trader misses entirely. This guide walks through the major intermarket relationships, explains the mechanism behind each one (not just the statistical pattern), and finishes with the most important section: why correlations break down and how to use them as context rather than signals.
Three forces wire markets together:
The most cited intermarket relationship: when the US dollar falls, gold (XAU/USD) tends to rise, and vice versa. The mechanism has two layers.
The mechanical layer: gold is priced in dollars globally. If the dollar weakens 2% against the world's currencies, gold becomes 2% cheaper for every non-dollar buyer on earth — buyers in euros, yen, or rupees suddenly face a discount, demand responds, and the dollar price of gold gets bid back up. Nothing about gold itself changed; the measuring stick shrank.
The macro layer: the same forces that weaken the dollar — falling US real interest rates, easier monetary policy, fiscal concerns — independently make gold more attractive, because gold pays no yield and its biggest competitor is the interest-bearing dollar. When yields fall, the cost of holding gold (the yield you give up) falls with them.
A worked reading: DXY breaks below a multi-week support level with a full-bodied daily close. The gold chart, at the same moment, is pressing the top of a consolidation range. The dollar breakdown is context that raises the credibility of a gold breakout — a disciplined trader still waits for gold's own chart to confirm (a close above its range), still defines invalidation on gold's own structure (below the range high it broke), and still sizes by the stop distance. The correlation upgraded the setup's context; the entry, stop, and size all came from the gold chart itself.
Gold's tightest macro relationship is with real yields (Treasury yields minus inflation expectations). Rising real yields raise the opportunity cost of holding a zero-yield metal and tend to press gold down; falling or negative real yields remove that cost and historically accompany gold's strongest runs. When the gold-dollar correlation seems broken, the real-yield chart usually explains why.
DXY is roughly 58% euro. EUR/USD rising therefore means DXY falling, almost mechanically. This matters for one practical reason: reading both charts is nearly reading one chart twice, and "confirmation" between them is an illusion. If you want genuinely independent dollar information, look at USD/JPY, USD/CHF, or dollar pairs against commodity currencies instead.
Canada is a major oil exporter, so rising oil tends to strengthen the Canadian dollar (USD/CAD falls). The mechanism is trade flows: higher oil means more dollars converted to CAD to buy Canadian exports, plus an improving terms-of-trade story attracting investment. The same logic links the Australian dollar to industrial metals and Chinese demand, and the Norwegian krone to North Sea oil. Commodity currencies are, in part, commodity charts wearing currency costumes.
Long-term yields are the discount rate the market applies to future cash flows. Growth and tech companies have most of their value far in the future, so rising long yields mathematically compress growth-stock valuations more than value stocks' — which is why sharp yield spikes historically hit the Nasdaq harder than the Dow. The effect is strongest when yields move fast; slow grinds higher are absorbed far more easily than 20-basis-point daily jumps.
The VIX measures the priced cost of S&P 500 options insurance. It spikes when equities fall sharply and decays when they grind higher — an inverse relationship so reliable it is almost definitional. The chart-reading use: a sharp equity dip with a muted VIX response often reads as orderly repositioning; the same dip with VIX exploding signals genuine fear. The pairing adds texture a price chart alone lacks.
On risk-off days, a whole bloc moves together: equities down, commodity currencies down, crypto down, yen and franc up, Treasuries up, VIX up, gold usually (not always) up. Risk-on flips every sign. Recognizing "today is a risk-off day" explains most of what you see across charts — and warns you that your three open "diversified" positions may secretly be one position: short fear or long fear.
Every relationship above is a tendency, not a law, and each one fails in well-documented ways:
The disciplined conclusions: use correlations as context that raises or lowers confidence in what an asset's own chart shows; never enter, stop, or size one market off another market's chart; and check, rather than assume, that a historical relationship is currently behaving — a 60-day rolling glance at both charts takes seconds.
No. Pairs and relative-value trading require regime awareness, financing math, and sizing sophistication beyond a beginner's toolkit. Use correlations for context; trade single charts with defined risk.
The mechanical ones — DXY/EUR-USD by construction, and the dollar-gold pricing channel — are the most persistent. The behavioral ones (risk-on/risk-off blocs, yields vs. tech) are powerful but regime-dependent.
Since institutional adoption, Bitcoin has mostly traded like a high-beta risk asset, tracking Nasdaq risk appetite. That correlation has flipped between strong and weak repeatedly — it is the canonical example of why you check correlations rather than assume them.
Pull up two charts side by side — DXY and gold is the classic pairing — and narrate a month of their interaction candle by candle. ChartsQuest members can also work through the interactive macro playbook inside the app, which pairs each relationship with an annotated chart.
Continue with our guide to trading time frames, or start the free chart-reading quest at ChartsQuest.
This article is educational content only and is not financial, investment, or trading advice; markets involve risk of loss, and historical relationships can change or fail at any time.
ChartsQuest se proporciona solo con fines educativos. Nada aquí constituye asesoramiento financiero, legal o de trading.
Parte del contenido de ChartsQuest puede crearse, editarse o acelerarse con la asistencia de herramientas de IA.
Los cuatro patrones más comunes: anatomía, reglas de confirmación, objetivos medidos y — sobre todo — cómo cada uno falla.
Leer →
MiembrosUn enfoque estructural a las tendencias: cómo definirlas objetivamente, operar pullbacks en lugar de perseguir, y reconocer la rotura que las termina.
Leer →
Qué significan las temporalidades, por qué el mismo mercado cuenta historias diferentes en cada una, y un flujo multi-temporal sereno para principiantes.
Leer →